Scott Morrow - "Freed Predator not a Story"
Pedophile and predater apologist, Scott Morrow states the innocent verdict of child predator Thomas Samuel Moffitt was not worth a front page story. On it's face this would appear that the pedoden is "taking the high road" or "not protecting pedophiles", but as we have learned in the past. This, as we all know, is never the case.Illegal asks, "If it is not a hoax, and a Perveted-Justice / Dateline/ TCAP bust was acquitted, why is it not the front page story here at Corrupted Justice?"
Scott Morrow replies, "It's not a "hoax" - And it's not a front-page story because, while it is important, the front-page story regarding MSNBC's failure to have a number of motions against them dismissed is bigger news."
One might ask, why does Scott Morrow say that the Conradt case is more news worthy than the Moffit acquittal.
The answer is simple:
Conradt is a martyr. A dead predator can be promoted as a victim. A dead predator can not be interogated. A dead predator can not explain the child porn in his possession. A dead predator can be put on a pedestal and held up as a victim.
Moffit is alive. A live predater can prey again and needs to be watched. Scott Morrow's plan is to not talk about the acquittal as part of his job to allow Moffit the child predator to slide back into society hopefully unnoticed. The quicker Moffit has the heat taken off of him, the quicker he can be back on the computer and on the prowl.
If Scott Morrow was as anti-Perverted Justice as he claims to be, then posting the acquittal front page article would be a no brainer. He would have used his best language, along with Perverted Justice quotes bragging about a 100% conviction rate and their past quotes stating just how correct they (Corrupted Justice) was in their view of Perverted Justice.
But since the real focus is the protection of predators, it would be unwise to focus on the acquittal of child predator Moffitt, because it might cause an undue burden on his trying to stay out of the limelight.
5 comments:
Let's not forget that if Morrow put Misfitt up on the front page it would be akin to a blatant admission Perverted-Justice was right. CJ is nothing more than a safe haven for pedophiles, predators, sex offenders, and apologists/enablers.
Morrow and his den of social screwups know that despite the inability for the jury to find Moffit guilty does NOT negate the FACT that he had an inappropriate chat with whom he thought was a child, and got off his ass to go to the bust house. He went there. He went to the door. He typed those words. No one "pretending" or "role-playing" would act on it and set up a meet. Fact is, the temptation was too great for this would-be child raper.
Keeping him off the front page is merely a strategic move to prevent people from asking what PJ has all along, "why? why do you cheer when a pedophile goes free?"
Perhaps Morrow was intelligent enough, as it's even clear from the court records, to realize that he got off on a technicality and it really had nothing to do with a failure on the part of Perverted Justice, just another loophole in the law. Not that Morrow and intelligent should ever go in a sentence, unless "un" is in there as well.
I think Pretztail's right about that, it's a simpler explanation for overlooking it. This isn't to say he wasn't happy at seeing one of PJ's cases going through, but to say he didn't report it with the primary motivation of protecting this guy doesn't make any sense at all.
It's possible that not mentioning it as a consideration for not putting him in the spotlight could be a reason, but that isn't the same as actively protecting someone. Plus, it does seem like a secondary consideration to just reporting any failure to discredit someone making you look bad, as P has suggested.
Castration comes to mind.;
They neuter pets. Why not rapists?
Post a Comment